What is the trade-off between memory mirroring and usable capacity?
The trade-off between memory mirroring and usable capacity is essentially:
π Higher reliability and fault tolerance vs π¦ Reduced available memory for workloads
Letβs break it down clearly in the context of enterprise systems like IBM POWER10 servers.
Memory mirroring maintains two identical copies of data in separate memory regions (or DIMMs):
π If one memory module fails, the system continues using the other copy without interruption.
π You sacrifice half your RAM for redundancy.
π This is why it's common in mission-critical workloads.
π Usually a small overhead, but noticeable in memory-intensive workloads.
With PowerVM:
π No application changes needed
| Aspect | Memory Mirroring Enabled | Disabled |
|---|---|---|
| Usable memory | β ~50% | β 100% |
| Fault tolerance | β Very high | β Lower |
| Availability | β Near-zero downtime | β Possible outages |
| Write bandwidth | β Reduced | β Full |
| Cost efficiency | β Lower (more RAM needed) | β Higher |
Memory mirroring is a classic enterprise trade-off: